The Sprog mentioned in the thread is fine as a hardware device to program locos (and it does somewhat more than that), but it cannot interface to your Lenz system. If into not-too-complicated DIY electronics, there is the XnTCP interface which can be built for around £60. Trouble is that new device is broucher-ware at present, having been announced ages ago and not actually put on sale. You'll be spending a lot on detection hardware!įor a Lenz system, you need the Lenz computer interface unit, which is somewhat expensive at over £100, and I think in very short supply due to the promise of a new device from Lenz.
#Rocrail vs jmri software
From that, I'd conclude that TrainController's programming tool uses rather less than all the features of DecoderPro.įor automation, TrainController is very good, and quite frankly, the software cost is not significant if you are really going to automate running.
If you dig through TrainController's documentation, you'll find a reference to using some of the information provided in the decoder files from the JMRI project.
#Rocrail vs jmri full
When you progress to full computer control you can try Traincontroller vs Rocrail vs PanelPro and see which you prefer and whether you want to buy the excellent but expensive Traincontroller or use the free Rocrail or JMRI system. I would also recommend getting a "Sprog" which is ideal as a stand alone programmer (and low power DCC system!) I have a Lenz 100 system and find DecoderPro an excellent piece of software. I am currently using a Lenz 100 with various Lenz Gold, Silver, Standard+ and SWD Sound decoders.Īny information regarding these programmes would be much appreciated. What I am interested to know is, is there any point buying RR&Cos TrainProgrammer over the free JMRI DecoderPro? Has anyone used both programmes are there any benerfits to the RR&Co product, I am interested in its ability to automatically run in new locos, but there may be a free source programme that already does this. Characteristics: Digital system: DCC, with BiDi. I an very happy with the change, James is a fantastic guy he will help at any time to resolve any issues.I am looking at getting into computer control and I thought a good first step would be the ability to programme decoder CVs. rocrail) a layout can be driven however completely simply with a PC or a laptop.
#Rocrail vs jmri driver
Due to iTrain restrictions I am using JMri to control the entire route setting and allow the iPad as a driver with two throttles.
#Rocrail vs jmri trial
It has allowed me to integrate the computer to trial iTrain which was fantastic. So in conclusion I have a very modern setup which has allowed me to control from the computer, an iPad or iPhone also a handset. Just make sure you use the DR5000 to write you addresses and it work a treat. I also had an issue with the way the ESU programmer locked the addresses but that was easily resolved. The system is that quick with its protection that the sound on my locos often does not die and restart completely on a short. After a further discussion with James I bought a booster (a 5033) and set the booster for the track and the DR5000 feed for the assessories and it works a treat. I had two covering two districts, well the DR5000 was just too good and beat them every time for short-circuit protection. One of the issues was the Powershield power protection units. I took the jump bought a DR5000, it was not a completely smooth transition as I had a lot of other legacy items in the mix. I had lots of conversations with James from DCC Automation about this, he said the same thing and he was right. So based on my limited understanding of RocRail, I would say JMRI would have more functionality, but RocRail looks to be more suited to automated running. Hi, I was an NCE user and still am on my exhibition layout (that may change soon). RocRail is more European-centric in it's implementation, while JMRI is North America based (although it has been applied to other countries operations as well.).
0 kommentar(er)
